Obama and the Economy
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/magazine/24Obamanomics-t.html?_r=2&em&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Today, the economy is the issue that concerns the most Americans ( I'm
guessing when you ask someone, they will more likely say the wars, but
come on, I'm confident most people really don't care about that. If
you think I'm wrong, prove it and do something to end it.)
In the aftermath of the mortgage fallout and housing crisis (silly
bankers.), the US economy is at a standstill (well, slowly but
surely), growing about 1.9% last quarter. David Leonhardt goes on to
say that "the details are too technical for most of us to
understand..." Meaning, you simpletons can't handle something to this
caliber... Anyway, that irritated me a little bit, because he can make
some attempt at explaining something, but I'll rest my cynical
perspective aside... for now.
So, as the economy grows year after year, economic growth usually
would be accompanied by increased income. The bottom 60% of Americans
no longer benefit from this economic growth, earning less than
(accounting for inflation) they earned in 2000. Speaking of which, I
will conquer Thomas Friedman's The World Is Flat. but yea, that's part
of the reason. Then there's Social Security, which will become a huge
problem within the next decade. Oh oh, and remember Bush's idea which
granted tax rebates to consumers of gas guzzling monster trucks?
Genius. Simply proof that George W Bush Jr. in fact does has sexual
relations with crude oil. I have photographic evidence of this as
well.
ok ok, so let me reflect some things from the article.
Cap and trade programs to curb CO2 emission, serving to regulate
industry, but allowing the emissions permits to be distributed based
on the free market principles. The money earned from the sales of the
permits can aide Americans whom face steeper costs (b/c of the
regulation and increased costs of production).
Obama seeks to renew the US economy, and plans to regulate/ watch over
Wall Street more carefully with an SEC 2.0, essentially. Furthermore,
the Fed will have a more permanent oversight of the banks, rather than
helping out in extreme situations, thus reducing the risk of such a
crisis again (ie Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were given blank checks
from the treasury to meet any expenses to prevent a fall out).
"McCain, ..., would cut taxes for the top 0.1 percent of earners —
those making an average of $9.1 million — by another $190,000 a year,
on top of the Bush reductions. Obama would raise taxes on this top 0.1
percent by an average of $800,000 a year."
hehe. I just saw 9.1 million a year and wanted to vommit.
then there's the green collared worker. Address both the energy issue
and economy, simultaneously. Especially if you look at Bloomberg's
ideas for NYC (hehe).
Apparently covering buildings with solar panels and windmills. Now
that would be one heck of an expensive project. I haven't looked into
the specifics at all, but i definitely feel reducing the need for
energy is a much more tangible feat.
OK, that really wasn't coherent. I apologize.
Until next time!
Peace.
Comments [0]